Pages

Thursday, June 11, 2020

Some Initial Thoughts on Poisoning in GURPS

I've been unsatisfied with poisons in GURPS for a while.

My current campaign, DF Felltower, has compounded my dissatisfaction.

Some of it is my own fault. Characters get poisoned, and I forget to keep applying the effects. Players, let's face it, has zero incentive to remind the GM to kill them off with the poison that affected them. They often don't even know if they've been poisoned, especially if the GM is enforcing fog-of-war to avoid PCs casting Instant Neutralize Poison a split-second after because they meta-know the character was poisoned with an ongoing effect. It's one more thing for a GM to track, and with the size of my group and my battles that's asking a lot. Add in the delay of some poisons - especially if the victim is SM+1 and adds an additional delay - and it's tough to deal with.

Some of it is the fault of games in general. You get poisoned, you usually get a roll to avoid the effects. Most of the time, you either suffer a lesser effect on success or a bad effect on failure. Cyclical poisons have an ongoing effect, but again, you generally get to keep rolling and usually this negates the effect. So poisoning isn't that scary, especially if your hearty and healthy PC can shrug it off. In a game with GURPS with point-buy, even the least healthy and least hearty among the PCs will be superior to the average human in HT.

One way to deal with it - that I've done - is to make poisons much more instant and save-or-die. My DF game features a lot of quick poisons that have HT rolls in the -3 to -5 range, and almost always have an effect even if you make your resistance roll (a D&D "save.")

Despite all of that, poisons aren't terribly scary. You can usually tough them out and deal with the effects with a couple-three healing spells and move on like it never happened. Neutralize Poison is a useful spell but it's not critical to have; you can get away without it most of the time. It's just convenient. Antivenins, magical and otherwise? Don't waste your cash, it's likely you'll shrug off the effects or just heal the damage.

I'm not pleased with that. Getting poisoned should be a big deal. In some games, especially video games and some PBM games I was involved it, it was major - you got poisoned and you needed to deal with it in a specific way or eventually die/suffer long-term from it. How to make that the case?

Here are some ideas.

- Poison resistance should determine the severity of poisoning, not negate its effects. A straight HT roll means that 50% of people exposed to a poison show no effects from it. It should be more like 50% suffer less than the other 50%.

- Poisons should all have some kind of medium-term and long-term effect; this may be curable or something you can tough out and eventually heal, but the effects should require specific cures. It shouldn't be enough to just drop down a lot of Major Healing spells or drink plenty of Minor Healing Potions and be done with it.

- Getting poisoned may not be obvious to the PC, but the player may need to be informed so they can track it. You can deal with the meta-issue by required people to make some kind of roll to understand they've been poisoned. Either that, or under any threat someone may have to be flagged as poisoned until they know they're not.

- There needs to be some kind of way of physically or virtually (in a VTT) tracking a poison. That way the effects aren't left to memory.

I'll be working on the first two for my venomous creatures; the second two I think I can implement right away. I'd like poison to be a lot scarier and a lot easier to implement. It's supposed to be a threat, and it's supposed to be the way a creature deals with foes without just inflicting massive direct trauma (in other words, high damage rolls.) This isn't meant to punish players or PCs, but it is meant to challenge them and bring poisons forward as an actual threat, not just a roll to make and then forget about.

5 comments:

  1. Games that make poison damage-only and especially those with unlimited casting and/or cheap 'n plentiful healing potions make poison a non-issue. I think the solution is to use more realistic effects than simple damage. Also as a general rule poisons and venoms don't have an onset in mere seconds. When the current combat is done and you drop out of hyper-speed the poison starts its effects. This eases the workload on the GM during combat, their busiest time, and offloads to the less busy exploration time.

    Nausea/disorientation/spasms - affected character suffers a penalty to all rolls while poisoned, resistance roll determines severity of the penalties and how long they last (e.g., -6 for 4 hours vs -3 for 2 hours).

    If your game has specific hit locations this is another good one:
    Swelling - the affected target location bloats and swells from infection and blood pooling, resistance roll decides if the limb is lost at the end of the duration (the resistance roll is not needed until the end, all effects happen before that) (e.g., limb is unusable for 4 hours then either requires regeneration to restore or recovers on its own based on the RR).

    Loss of consciousness/debilitation - character is completely disabled, either bed ridden, weak and feverish, or unconscious. Awaken and other magics do not counter this effect unless they are designed to counter poisons. Resistance roll determines how long the effect lasts, and it can be a long time (e.g., 24 hours or 8 hours with a successful RR).

    Convulsions - Another effect that happens no matter what and doesn't need an RR until the end of the course, character wracked by violent convulsions and is not only completely disabled but cannot be held or carried by companions. Convulsions can last for a random die roll of seconds or minutes. Subject takes a number of dice of injury from what they do to themselves if not held and either magic or a large number of CP in grappling rules are needed to hold them to avoid this damage. At the end of the course roll that resistance roll, if it succeeds the character stops convulsing and is just naturally unconscious for 1D hours while their body recovers, otherwise they die.

    I hope these ideas help make venoms and poisons more interesting and easier to use. They should be usable in GURPS, D&D, or any game system that has a health/resistance/saving roll.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's good stuff Alex, thanks for writing it all out.

      Delete
  2. "Neutralize Poison is a useful spell but it's not critical to have; you can get away without it most of the time."

    This I deal with by not allowing the damage from an effect to be healable until the effect is over. Be it Acid, Poison, Disease, etc. If it's an ongoing effect you can't heal the damage, cure the effects, until you stop the source. So with poison I require a Neutralize Poison, because I don't generally do non-cyclic poisons (the ones for sale in the Adventurers book being a stand out exception).

    An interesting thing to note about Neutralize Poison, you have to know what the poison is in order to counter it (By RAW make a Poison roll or suffer -5 on the spell). So we're talking Poison rolls (and Esoteric Medicine if someone besides the caster made the Poison roll - my house rule). Also, I don't allow the spell to be cast if the poison cannot be "named" (IE, they have to know what the poison is, or at least how it's working, no -5 to the roll, I simply don't allow the spell to work).

    I tend to break effects into two categories: Damage (HP, FP, Attribute) and Conditions. Sometimes a poison will do both. Sometimes I do quick cycles, mostly for HP/FP damage, sometimes long cycles, mostly for conditions and Attribute damage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that treating poisons similar to FP loss taken due to dehydration, lack of sleep, etc is a good step in the right direction. Maybe healing applied while a poison is in effect is treated as ablative DR against the effect instead of direct HP Gained?

      Delete
  3. Perhaps we can look forward to GURPS Dungeon Fantasy 23-ish: Poisons?

    ReplyDelete