Tuesday, October 10, 2017

Spellcaster hirelings in DF

Dungeon Fantasy 15 has a number of spellcaster templates, for both 62-point helpers and 125-point henchmen.



In my own game, I tend to make caster hirelings much less commonly available than non-caster hirelings.

I have a few reasons for this.

Difficulty of making them

GURPS character generation is a lot of fun, and I love what you can do with it, but making a list of 15-30 spells is not as fun for me. It's tough to make a good set of choices when you're making your own guy. NPCs can be more throwaway but they need to be effective in their niche. So they take time to make. While someone can hire an archer and I can pretty much go from template to loaded out NPC with a personality in a few minutes, if that, a caster will take me more time. I'm loath to spend that time if I don't need to, and I'm really unhappy spending that time at game (especially as I also field requests and questions about actual PCs.)

Belated requests

Usually people don't know they want or need a caster until the day of game. "We need a wizard of any kind" might be answerable with a 125-point Apprentice, if I can sit down and make one quickly. Or if I have one handy. What if there are specific requests? When you add on "with See Invisible and Levitate and enough FP to get us all over the castle wall" it's a bigger problem. Then I need a fully-made wizard with certain spells. "No" ends up being easier than "make a roll, and if you roll well, everyone leave me alone for 10 minutes while I make up a guy."

High Expectations

No matter what, once a caster gets introduced it's common for people to start seeing them as full-fledged master (whatevers.) Acolyte? Cleric. Apprentice necromancer? Master necromancer. Beginner elementalist with Stone Missile-13? 18d Stone Missile Sniper capable of firing into melee without hesitation. I exaggerate a bit, but not by much. The expectations rise. A 125-point guy who serves as a bandage for a serious gap in available spellcasting needs gets seen as a full-out replacement for a 250-point delver.

On top of that, skill expectations are high - all casters getting a -1 to energy cost for skill, able to maintain spells for free, and succeeding in casting despite penalties? That's a feature of well-made 250-point delvers. That's where a good measure of those extra 125 points go.

Annoying the PCs

If you do get a good, effective, well-designed caster, then it tends to eat into what the PC casters do. This simultaneously annoys the player due to overlap, and makes for less likelihood the NPC gets used. "We already have a necromancer" or "We already have an artillery mage" means the guy doesn't get hired. Or it means he gets hired and people choose to use their non-caster PC foe the session, turning this back into the High Expectations issue.


This tends to be why you don't see a lot of caster hirelings in my games, and see the same ones over and over once you do. I add in game explanations, too - casters being less common, wizards being more suspicious, the church being unhappy that delvers show up every three months saying, "Funny story, Father so-and-so died and was eaten, who else you got?" But a good portion of it is the mechanical issues of making them up, designing them well, having them ready to go, and then the expectations issue.

11 comments:

  1. Coming to it from the D&D perspective (sorry), there are few elves who would work for money - especially if the party contains dwarfs or half-orcs. So that's easy.

    Usually if the party want a new spell caster, I will run him as an NPC for one adventure and then hand him off to one of the players as a second PC or as a henchman. Culturally, wizards are not eager to be wage slaves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You don't have to apologize for coming from a D&D perspective. It's just rules assumption clashes can happen.

      In-game cultural issues are good explanations, too. If it was easier to make good caster NPCs, and easier to use and run them, I'd be more willing to use them. Since it's not and I'm not, anything that explains less spellcasting delvers-for-hire is nice to have ready.

      Delete
  2. I enjoy spellcaster hirelings myself

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You could hire a guy who just knows Hold Portal and Knock. Just a door guy. A professional door guy. Limited-application casting is perfect for a wizard hireling

      Delete
  3. I have 3 npcs that get continuous use; an apprentice (journeyman) wizard with Whimsy, a necromantic apprentice who is invariably used more for lore, and a Seasoned Apprentice Wizard who has no energy attacks. Another wizard's apprentice without fire attacks became a 187 pt pc for a while, but I would say none of these were optimal builds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A very, very Limited Wish* style spell based on how Wild magic worked in AD&D.

      * In that it can replicate other spells or do things "a spell should be able to do" just in weird ways.


      The henchman (Ludlow) likes to suggest he cast it and has been threatened with physical violence if ever casts it in my character's (Jareth - a 'henchman' Sage) presence.

      I know how much terribleness it can wreck.

      Delete
  4. And seriously, Peter!

    It's Tuesday!

    Not even a "Six/Howevermany went in and Everything is Fine/Terrible"?

    You're killing us here!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We didn't play this past Sunday. Game is next Sunday.

      Delete
    2. Keeping us in suspense for another week! Villainous!

      Guess we'll just have to tune in next week to find out if Raggi was in a coma, did Dryst pull a surprise appearance, what is Baron Sterick doing with those bodies, is Dr. Lovegood only faking his marriage?

      Delete
    3. All of the above, probably.

      Delete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...