Sunday, May 22, 2016

Longer delves in Felltower?

I'm starting to think about longer delves in Felltower.

One of the central, fundamental decisions about my game is that you start and end in town.

We've had to violate that a few times, where it simply wasn't possible in game to leave the dungeon given the time we had in the real world to play. But that's only happen a bit less than one session in ten. Not bad given the vagaries of time to complete combats, the occasional "shortcut" that dumps the party deeper in the dungeon, and so on.

It also allows me to present "extend the session" as an option, but with a cost. I only hand out XP for delves, and a delve is defined as ending in town. Want XP for a session? End it in town. Spent two sessions in the dungeon, you get one delve's worth of XP for it. The PCs have pushed this to a three-session delve once, and ended up with nothing more than they took during day one. Not a great way to advance your character.

I don't intend to end that "start and end in town" rule. It's a good one because it allows for attendance as you wish. Players can make game-time decisions about which PC to run, which NPCs to truck along, what to do, etc. It's a good basic rule for the game.

But . . .

But my players are beginning to edge towards exploring areas that will have to take multiple sessions. Areas which may not be easy to go-and-return, go-and-return from iteratively. Some areas are absolutely take-it-or-leave-it, one-time offers. I don't want to give away too many details, but it'll be clearer when the players find them. It's fair to spend more time in them. It would be silly to make such areas and then force rapid exploration and immediate return.

On the other hand, I don't want to encourage people to willingly stay multiple sessions in the dungeon willy-nilly, figuring that they'll amortize the fixed costs of getting in the dungeon across a few sessions of delving. That might make sense in a mix of game and real-world logic. However it also means that players that missed session one of a multi-session delve have nothing to do except run an NPC (maybe.) It also means that if you're there for session one, you might have to let others run your guy and potentially get him killed off. That's not fun.

How to deal with that? I have a few rough ideas.*

GM-Forced Multisession XP

One idea is if the GM is forcing a multisession delve, then XP is per session, not per delve. However, XP award needs are based on multiple of the usual needs and awards.

For example, if you need X loot to get 4 xp, then you need 3x to get 12 xp in a forced three-session delve. Failure to meet that means you'd get 6xp. You'd need a very large swatch of territory explored to get bonus XP for exploring. Many lost NPCs and PCs would be -3, not -1, and a clean run would be 3 xp, not 1 xp.

(I could do this by session, period - award at the end, don't allow spending until town, and make a 3-part delve into a series of three individual delves . . . that seems annoying at best, and leads to complications about lost treasures, when PCs die, etc. So, no.)

So yeah, you could potentially go into an area that will require multiple sessions and come out with between 15 and 21 XP (sufficient loot, lots and lots and lots of new exploration, clean run). Of course, you could have done three individual delves and gotten those same points, too.

Who decides?

Almost certainly me, the GM, with some input from the players. "We want to spend just a little more time exploring this sublevel behind the one-way door" isn't going to cut it. "Sorry, guys, this room will implode one hour after you leave it, gone forever" certainly will. It wouldn't normally be for just exploring Felltower. I put in some easy ways to get around (once you get past the crust of defenses, and figure out where they are and how to use them) so this wouldn't have to happen. If you just want to extend your dungeon time because you don't want to pay the orcs another 1000 sp, that's fine, XP is still for one delve.

I say "almost certainly" because the other option is just my decision, with no input. I wouldn't hand this over to a consensus decisions because it undermines the fundamental rule. It would become, more generally, delves are as many sessions as you want them to be. I'm looking to handle special cases, so I ned to have most or all of the input on what's a special case.

How many sessions?

I'll probably have to think of a par for each area that I consider like this. If I think something is a two-session-delve area, and you take three sessions, I'll award XP based on two delves.


And there are some direct complications, not just decisions to make, too.


One complication is that I have one day of real time = one day of game time (although the reverse isn't exactly true.) I'll have to decide on a case-by-case basis what that means. If a room is on Elf Hill time, that's fine, whatever time passed out of game passed in game. Otherwise, there may be forced adjustment back in town. "You left on Sunday 5/22/16, the delve was one-game-day, and you took the next seven weeks off to recover. It's now Sunday 7/10/2016."


I'm not at all sure how I'll handle players joining in. Leaving is okay - someone else runs your guy. We've done that even though it's not ideal. What happens if the players are in a multi-session delve and someone shows up?

One idea I have is to put in a new group. If Vryce, Dryst, Mo, Hasdrubel, and Gale are in a multi-session delve and then the next week Mo's player can't make it and Gale's and Hjalmarr's show up and want to play, well, we build a group around them. Vryce's player could run Gerry. Dryst's player could run Angus McSwashy. Hsdrubel's player can make up a new guy. Etc. So long as that group does a normal go-and-return session and won't overlap oddly with the other group, we're fine. We could have:

Group A goes in.
Group B goes in and comes back.
Group A continues.
Group A finishes and returns.

I could do a really weird gamey solution like, "he was following you all along" (we've done it, it works) but in some cases that won't work. "You followed us through the cursed teleporting scroll we read?" That might be a bit much sometimes. So would handing out PC summoning items (Break the stick, and a PC of your choice shows up - why wouldn't you abuse the hell out of that? It creates more problems than it solves.) GURPS Dungeon Fantasy lacks the Teleport spell for a reason, too - not just to prevent bypassing in-dungeon obstacles but also to avoid making "go back to town and get it" or "I'll just ferry us back to town with Teleport" a simple solution to most problems.

For what I'm thinking, it's unlikely there would be interaction beyond, "I'd highly recommend you don't go into that room." Unless, of course, group B is a delve meant to link up everyone for some giant combined session. Not that I want one-player, two-character situations in this campaign. Been there, done that, it was a blast, but it wasn't 250-400+ point characters.

So yeah, this is what I'm mulling over if the players do head into areas that really aren't conducive to go-and-return delving.

* None of these are final. None of this is decided. Absolutely none of this applies to our current split-session ended-in-the-dungeon session whatsoever.


  1. Force them to end the session in a *camp*, for starters, to keep things from starting medias in res with a different crew. Second, get an idea of everyone's schedules, and take those guys who might be coming later as NPCs right away. Those guys who only show up now and then? They can play one of the characters tagging along, even if they're not their usual characters.

    1. Not-stopping mid-combat would be ideal, yes. Forcing camp might be tricky - what counts as camp? Does this mean I'm offering safe rest? Do I need to allow them to "camp" but still re-con looting the bodies when combat ends moments before I pack up and leave? I'm going to have to think about how useful and enforceable that would be.

      I'm expecting these to happen at least sometimes without planning - the PCs read the cursed scroll halfway through the session, they stumble into the one-time area and it takes longer than one session, etc. So I couldn't really take the middle suggestion. That would also open the door to "take along the missing player's PC" as a thing. It's one thing to say, okay, he's still with you, finish the session and get him out of there ASAP, and another to say, "We need a druid, bring the druid in case it's a two-session delve."

      Having drop-ins run NPCs is already a thing. It's more the regulars who hit a spot of busyness that I'm concerned about. It's more fun to be able to show up and run your own guy, and the couple of NPCs who reliably come now are low-point or are the Ally of a PC. Except Raggi, but there is no way I'm handing over Raggi's sheet and seeing if someone can play him appropriately crazy. I prefer the mystery and "will he die?" to an expected "play him carefully so I don't sit out the rest of the session" approach.

    2. You could have "safe rooms" which allow for one night's camp or something similar. I've used that before in extended dungeon crawls. Of course, at least twice the players missed that a room was a safe zone and camped in an open area and got ambushed...

      More to the point, they're strictly one time only or require clearing a zone first. It also makes Survival (Dungeon) useful for sussing out that the area's indeed safe for the night.

    3. Those might be useful to make the "camp" requirement Charles suggested work for me. Thanks.

      The big issues are all logistical and player-oriented, though. The game is built around "we play with who shows up, your guy only delves when you are there" and multi-session delves mess with that. That's where the toughest part of having clearly multi-session areas but also limited-access areas in the dungeon really is. And those exist to limit "nibble the apple until it's finished" delves and occasionally force act-now-or-never opportunities.

    4. Was going to suggest safe rooms or even safe 'towns' in the Dungeon.

      The dungeon towns might be a small community that charges upkeep (or not), limited goods, limited services so the players still need to go back to base, but its easy enough to have other PCs start there or the players finish there if there is no time to leave the dungeon.

      eg A theoretical magician (and their small group of bodyguards) in the dungeon who has carved out a little area for magical research. He'll give you quests, resupply you and buy your stuff (all at a not so good price).

    5. Those are good suggestions. But I really want to avoid adding PC-facing resources to solve a player-facing problem. In other words, my concerns are "How to make the XP system and attendance-optional pickup game approach work with multi-session delves" more than "how to allow PCs to sustain themselves over a long dungeon crawl." Any solution that solves A by solving B will mean all places that have multi-session play happen need some variation of B.

      If every one-way door to a sublevel, every pocket dimension, every cursed scroll that sends you into a labyrinthine maze also comes with a town, a wizard, a safe room, etc. that also can just happen to have the new attendee's character in it, I feel like I'm changing the problem from one thing (player and XP issues) to another (in-game resource access and transport.)

      I really need to talk to my players about this. And some of the issues won't get resolved until we hit the first of these areas, and I can talk about them in specific without giving away what's ahead but unknown. Best that my players expect that some doors aren't just "one last door before we go home" and some options are now-or-never even if it's 6:30 pm and I need to be out the door at 7:00 pm, but not know why that is so just yet.

  2. Is there any way to ease up on the restocking? Seems that part of the slow-down is related to having to fight your way deeper and deeper just to get to the new stuff. Less critters up top makes it a lot easier to hand-wave away the travel from surface to new areas.

    1. I don't think it's the re-stocking. Most of the re-clearing of areas has happened because the PCs went to the same places over and over to try and avoid dealing with the orc problem.

      In any case, I'm talking about things a bit bigger than travel time to the depths - I'm talking now-or-never opportunities that just can't be passed up, even if the session is almost over, or ones where you can't leave until you complete them. Where handwaving travel back to town would be okay, if they could get to the point where return to town was possible!


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...